Classes r_Bag and r_List from API document don't actually exist?

[hholzgra]

Only mention of these two names is in ./rasodmg/collection.hh in a Doxygen comment:

./rasodmg/collection.hh:47: \Ref{r_Bag} and \Ref{r_List}. The protected members isOrdered and

and in the bundled .doc and .pdf versions of dev-guide-c++

How to reproduce: after a fresh checkout do:

$ cd rasdaman
$ grep -rni r_Bag .
./rasodmg/collection.hh:47: \Ref{r_Bag} and \Ref{r_List}. The protected members isOrdered and
Binary file ./manuals_and_examples/manuals/pdf/dev-guide-c++.doc matches

The only container template from the documentation that actually seems to exist is r_Set as far as i can tell …

[hholzgra]

Same with r_Any as far as I can tell …

[hholzgra]

Only r_Any occurrences in the source seem to be:

vagrant@precise64:~/rasdaman$ grep -r r_Any .
./rasdl/parse.cc: name ="r_Any";
Binary file ./manuals_and_examples/manuals/pdf/dev-guide-c++.doc matches

[Dimitar Misev]

Peter the documentation seems to be out of sync with the API.

[Peter Baumann]

that is correct. The rasodmg library implements only that part of the ODMG standard which is relevant for rasdaman. See the doxygen comment in rasodmg/collection.hh: "Possible subclasses are…".

[Peter Baumann]

PS: thanks for your attentiveness!